MySQL is highly scalable and can handle a large volume of data. In MySQL, you can create multiple users with different levels of permissions and roles. SQLite can cater only to one connection at a time. MySQL can handle multiple simultaneous connections. SQLite directly writes the data in a file and can move pretty easily. Also, it is time-consuming because of its size. SQLite supports only BLOB, NULL, INTEGER, TEXT, and REAL.ĭata portability in MySQL is tedious as you export it as a file and then move it to another system. MySQL supports almost all the data types like TINYINT, SMALLINT, MEDIUMINT, INT, BIGINT, FLOAT, DOUBLE, DOUBLE PRECISION, REAL, DECIMAL, NUMERIC, DATE, DATETIME, TIMESTAMP, YEAR, CHAR, VARCHAR, TINYBLOB, TINYTEXT, BLOB, TEXT, MEDIUMBLOB, MEDIUMTEXT, LONGBLOB, LONGTEXT, ENUM, SET, etc. SQLite is a very lightweight library of around 250 kb in size. MySQL server requires around 600 Mb of space for its functioning. SQLite is not only open source the code is also available in the public domain for commercial and personal usage. MySQL is open-source and managed by Oracle. SQLite is a serverless embedded database that runs as part of the application and can not connect with any other application over the network. MySQL requires a database server to interact with the client over the network. SQLite is entirely developed in C language. MySQL is developed in C and C++ languages. Comparison Table between MySQL vs SQLiteīelow is the topmost comparison between MySQL vs SQLite: MySQL SQLite performance tends to degrade with the increase in the volume of data as it writes the data directly in a file that occupies a lot of memory. Where MySQL is highly scalable and capable of handling a large volume of data, SQLite fails to perform at the same level. Scalability is the most important factor any developer would check for in the database. Unfortunately, SQLite has no provision for User Management, so at a time, one User can access the database. There is often a requirement where multiple developers need to work on the same database simultaneously MySQL is specially designed to cater to this need and can handle concurrent Users. When hosted on a cloud, users can utilize MySQL as a service, whereas SQLite does not provide support for this. With the advent of cloud services like Azure, Amazon Web Services, and Google Cloud, many companies are looking for a solution or a product that can be utilized as a service for its client. Any person can get access to the database files. Unfortunately, SQLite lacks all these features in fact, SQLite does not have any mechanism to authenticate the Users. MySQL offers built-in security features like SSH to authenticate its Users also, to grant limited privileges, you can assign different roles to a user. A database should have some authentication to avoid easy access to the data by an unauthorized person. Most applications deal with Personally Identifiable Information data that needs utmost security and limited access. Both database systems have the same access methods: JDBC, ADO.NET, and ODBC. MySQL has its API, whereas SQLite does not offer any. As you know to connect your application with the database, you need some connector or API that makes the connection setup easy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |